Comparison tool

Compare standards side by side

Filter by industry, buyer market, timeline and budget, then put up to four standards next to each other — scheme owner, timeline, indicative cost, buyer acceptance, audit frequency, the failures we see most often and what you need in place before the audit.

Quick comparisons
15 standards match — tap to add or remove (3 of 4 selected)
AttributeGMP+GMP+ Feed Safety Assurance3–6 months · Mid bandBRCGSBRCGS Food Safety, Packaging, Storage & Distribution3–6 months · Higher bandFSSC 22000FSSC 22000 Food Safety System Certification3–6 months · Higher band
Certification body / schemeGMP+ International, audited by approved certification bodiesGFSI-recognised (BRCGS)GFSI-recognised (Foundation FSSC)
Typical timeline3–5 months4–6 months4–6 months
Typical cost range₹1.5L – ₹4L₹2.5L – ₹6L₹2.5L – ₹6L
Buyer acceptanceRegional
Essential for European feed buyers and bulk hauliers
Regional
Graded AA to D — retailers read the grade, not just the certificate
Global
Preferred where buyers span several regions
Audit frequencyAnnual audit, plus unannounced checks in the cycleAnnual, unannounced option; grade sets the intervalAnnual surveillance, recertification every 3 years, unannounced once per cycle
IndustriesFeed, Logistics, ManufacturingFood, Packaging, LogisticsFood, Feed, Packaging
GeographyEurope-led feed chains, accepted worldwide by GMP+ participantsUK and EU retailers, growing acceptance in Gulf marketsGlobal — widely used by multinational manufacturers
Common fails
  • Sampling and retention plan not followed in practice
  • Purchases from non-certified suppliers without gatekeeping
  • Transport cleaning records incomplete (LCI codes missing)
  • Fundamental clause non-conformity dropping the grade
  • Root cause analysis too thin on corrective actions
  • Environmental monitoring and glass/brittle plastic control gaps
  • Food defence and food fraud plans written but never tested
  • Management review missing required inputs
  • Utilities and environmental monitoring evidence incomplete
Prerequisites
  • HACCP study
  • Feed safety manual
  • GMP+ Monitoring database registration
  • HACCP plan
  • Prerequisite programmes
  • Internal audit cycle completed once
  • ISO 22000 management system
  • ISO/TS 22002 prerequisite programme
  • HACCP study
Which should we pursue?

FSSC 22000 is the strongest default starting point, based on recognition, cost and delivery time.

Top pick100%FSSC 22000

Add filters for a needs-based score. Without them, ranking uses recognition, lower cost and delivery time.

#1FSSC 22000100% fit

Global buyer recognition

#2GMP+60% fit

Baseline recognition and practical delivery fit

Watch: Regional acceptance rather than global coverage
#3BRCGS60% fit

Baseline recognition and practical delivery fit

Watch: Regional acceptance rather than global coverage

If the buyer later asks for GMP+, plan the shared management-system work first, then add its scheme-specific requirements.

First step: Gap assessment against FSSC 22000, then a dated plan to the audit date. Cost ranges are indicative — the quote depends on sites, headcount and scope, and certification body fees are billed separately by the body.

Browse every standardTalk to a consultant

Timelines and cost ranges reflect the projects we run and are indicative only. Certificates are issued by independent certification bodies, whose audit fees are billed separately.